The FIFA World Cup has always been more than a football competition. It is a global event that mirrors the political climate, social tensions, and moral debates of its era. As the 2026 FIFA World Cup approaches, set to be hosted jointly by the United States, Canada, and Mexico, the tournament is already surrounded by intense controversy. Beyond discussions about expanded formats and stadium readiness, a far more complex debate is gaining momentum: should major footballing nations consider boycotting the World Cup over political and ethical concerns? This question strikes at the heart of modern sport. In a world where footballers are global icons, governments use sport as soft power, and fans demand ethical accountability, the line between football and politics has never been more blurred. The 2026 World Cup is shaping up to be a defining test of whether global football can truly remain neutral—or whether neutrality itself has become a political stance. The World Cup as a Political Stag...
Former Liverpool striker Michael Owen has stated that watching Darwin Nunez miss a wonderful opportunity against Everton was disheartening, given his prior performances this season.
Nunez has only scored once in the Premier League in his last nine appearances and has struggled in front of goal.Owen admitted that he couldn't believe the same striker shot straight at the goalkeeper despite having a gaping goal in front of him.

Comments
Post a Comment