The idea of a 64-team World Cup sounds, on paper, like a celebration of football’s global reach. More nations would get the chance to experience the tournament, more fans would see their flag on the biggest stage, and more stories from outside the traditional power centers would enter the world’s football conversation. But beneath that sense of inclusion lies a serious question: can the World Cup grow without losing the competitive sharpness, sporting balance, and emotional intensity that made it the most powerful tournament in football? In many ways, expanding to 64 teams could widen the event’s footprint while narrowing its meaning. The World Cup has always been more than a tournament. It is a global ritual built on tension, scarcity, and the feeling that every match matters. Part of its magic comes from the fact that qualification is hard, entry is precious, and the final tournament feels exclusive enough to carry real weight. When the field expands too much, the event risks changin...
Dreams are not what you see in your sleep, dreams are things which do not let you sleep.