Ruesha Littlejohn Receives Five-Match Ban For WWE-Style Takedown: What Happened?

Ruesha Littlejohn’s five‑match ban stems from a Women’s League Cup tie where she put Leicester City’s Hannah Cain in a headlock and wrestled her to the ground in what has widely been described as a “WWE‑style” takedown, leading the FA to decide that the standard three‑game punishment for violent conduct was “clearly insufficient” and to extend it to five matches after a hearing. The incident has ignited a wider debate about the limits of aggression in the women’s game, player safety, and how football should handle moments that cross the line from competitive physicality into dangerous, wrestling‑style moves.​

Setting the Scene: A Cup Tie Turns Chaotic

Crystal Palace were cruising with a 3–0 lead over Leicester City in a Women’s League Cup group match when the game suddenly lurched from routine to chaotic. The tie, played on 23 November 2025, was not broadcast live, so the full scale of what happened only became clear when clips of the footage began circulating online a day later.​

The flashpoint did not initially involve Ruesha Littlejohn or Hannah Cain directly. A coming‑together between Palace’s Olivia McLoughlin and Leicester’s Annabel Blanchard sparked a minor scuffle, the sort of jostling that usually ends with a few words from the referee and a free‑kick. As players converged around the incident, emotions flickered and the temperature on the pitch rose several notches.​

The “WWE‑Style” Takedown: What Actually Happened?

Into this bubbling crowd stepped Littlejohn, a 35‑year‑old Republic of Ireland international, seemingly with the initial intention of getting in between players. She gave Hannah Cain a small shove, to which Cain responded by pushing Littlejohn in the back – a brief exchange of pushes that, on most days, fizzles out almost instantly.​

Instead, it escalated at breakneck speed. Littlejohn reacted by grabbing Cain up around the neck area, locking her into what looked more like a grappling hold from a wrestling ring than a standard football tussle. In one swift motion she wrestled Cain to the ground, rolling or tripping as they went down, with Cain’s head and neck area appearing to bear the brunt of the impact – the moment that triggered the “WWE‑style” and “judo move” descriptions across social media and in headlines.​

The referee, having seen the incident from close range, reached immediately for the red card. There was no lengthy consultation, no hesitation; the contact and the way Cain was thrown to the turf left little room for interpretation. Littlejohn’s dismissal came around the 58th minute, leaving Palace to finish the match with ten players, though the 3–0 scoreline remained unchanged by full time.​

Why the FA Stepped In: From Three Games to Five

Under Football Association regulations, violent conduct that results in a straight red card usually brings a three‑match suspension. However, the rules also allow the FA to argue that this standard punishment is “clearly insufficient” if an incident is deemed truly exceptional, unusually dangerous, or egregious.​

In Littlejohn’s case, the FA submitted a formal claim of “clearly insufficient punishment” after reviewing the footage of the takedown. The argument was straightforward: grabbing an opponent around the neck and throwing her to the ground in that manner created a level of danger that went beyond normal violent conduct and carried a frightening risk of head, neck, or spinal injury.​

An independent regulatory commission heard the case. After assessing the incident and the FA’s claim, the commission agreed that the usual three‑game ban did not adequately reflect the seriousness of what had happened. It set aside the standard sanction and imposed a five‑match suspension instead, confirming that Littlejohn would miss five competitive fixtures rather than three.​

Which Games She Misses – And Why It Matters

The suspension spans multiple competitions, underlining how seriously the authorities viewed the offence. Under the commission’s decision, Littlejohn is ruled out of:​

• League fixtures against Birmingham City, Bristol City, and Sheffield United.​
• An FA Cup tie against Lewes.​
• A League Cup clash with Arsenal, a key group‑stage test for Palace.​

For Crystal Palace, who have only recently dropped out of the Women’s Super League and are trying to build momentum in the Championship and cups, losing a seasoned midfielder for five matches is a major blow. Littlejohn joined the club in September on a one‑year deal, bringing nearly two decades of experience from stints at Arsenal, Liverpool, Celtic, Aston Villa and others, as well as over 90 caps for the Republic of Ireland.​

That leadership and on‑field bite were part of her appeal, but this incident has turned the spotlight on the thin line between competitive edge and unacceptable aggression. Palace will now have to navigate a stretch of the season without a player they signed specifically to add nous and steel in midfield.​

Hannah Cain: Shock, Risk and Relief

From Leicester City’s perspective, the primary concern in the immediate aftermath was the health and wellbeing of Hannah Cain. Being dragged down by the neck, with the risk of landing awkwardly, is exactly the sort of scenario that can result in serious injury, especially in the head or cervical spine area – the fear echoed by many fans reacting online.​

Leicester manager Rick Passmoor later said Cain had been “shaken up” and upset by the incident, which is hardly surprising given the manner of the takedown and how it unfolded in a split‑second chaotic melee. Yet the mood around the club softened somewhat once it became clear she had escaped serious physical damage and was back in training ahead of Leicester’s next Women’s Super League match after the international break.​

That relative relief – no major injury, no prolonged absence – does not diminish how dangerous the moment looked. Instead, it reinforces why governing bodies feel compelled to act firmly when a player’s neck and head are put at risk in ways that resemble grappling sports more than football.​

Viral Footage and Fan Reaction

Because the game was not shown live, initial reports centred on a red card for violent conduct and whispers of a “WWE‑style” challenge, but the story did not truly explode until video clips hit social media. Once the footage appeared, it was shared widely on platforms like X and Reddit, where fans reacted with a mixture of shock, anger, and disbelief.​

Many supporters felt that the act went beyond the normal boundaries of even a heated match and called for a long ban, some even arguing that a suspension into future seasons would not have been excessive given the risk to Cain’s neck. Others, while condemning the challenge, urged against pile‑ons and personal abuse aimed at Littlejohn, arguing that discipline should come from the football authorities rather than online mobs.​

The viral nature of the clip also influenced the narrative. Once an incident becomes a global talking point, it shapes perceptions of the women’s game, with detractors often seizing on flashpoints to make broad, often unfair generalisations. In that context, the FA’s decisive action doubles as a message that the women’s game is ready to police itself strictly when lines are crossed.​

Littlejohn’s Response and Regret

In the days following the red card, Littlejohn acknowledged that her reaction on the pitch had gone too far. Speaking to RTÉ Sport, she admitted that she is an emotional player and that, in this instance, those emotions boiled over in a way she regrets. That admission signals an understanding that the incident was not just “one of those things” but something that warranted real reflection.​

She also indicated that she had not immediately contacted Cain in the aftermath but accepted that her behaviour had crossed the line and needed to be owned. Publicly accepting responsibility, even in measured form, is important for rebuilding trust with both opponents and supporters, particularly given Littlejohn’s status as a senior international figure and role model for younger players.​

What remains to be seen is how she channels this episode going forward. Some players emerge from such flashpoints with a recalibrated sense of where the line is; others struggle with the emotional side of a sport that demands intensity but punishes overreaction. Littlejohn’s own comments suggest she recognises the need to manage that fine balance more carefully in future.​

The FA’s Message on Violent Conduct

Beyond one player and one club, the five‑match ban broadcasts a clear message about violent conduct in the women’s game. Neck‑grabs, headlocks and wrestling‑style slams are seen as qualitatively different from late tackles or stray elbows because of the potential for catastrophic injury, which is exactly why this case triggered the FA’s “clearly insufficient punishment” mechanism.​

Women’s football has been under growing scrutiny regarding player welfare, particularly around head injuries and concussion protocols. Incidents that place unnecessary stress on the head and neck run against the grain of efforts to make the sport safer for players at all levels. By treating Littlejohn’s takedown as an exceptional case that merited extra matches on the sideline, the FA underlined that message: passion is welcome, dangerous grappling is not.​

The disciplinary process here – red card on the day, FA review, elevation to an independent commission, and a stiffer ban – shows how the system is supposed to work when an incident shocks both officials and the wider game. It also sets a precedent: future cases of similar wrestling‑style challenges can now look to this five‑match benchmark as a starting point.​

Reputation, Legacy and Second Chances

Littlejohn is not an unknown quantity on the women’s football scene. Over an 18‑year senior career, she has played for some of Britain’s most recognisable clubs and collected more than 90 caps for the Republic of Ireland, including appearances at major tournaments. That pedigree makes the incident even more jarring – this was not a young player losing control in a first taste of high‑pressure football but an experienced pro with a long track record.​

At the same time, that experience can work in her favour when it comes to rehabilitation. Veterans who admit mistakes, take their punishment and adjust their behaviour often find that supporters and pundits are willing to grant them a second chance, especially if they avoid repeat offences and show leadership afterwards. Some voices in the game have already urged against turning her into a permanent villain, arguing that excessive online abuse helps no one and that accountability and learning should be the priorities.​

For Littlejohn, how she uses the enforced break – whether to reflect, work on fitness, or prepare to return with a calmer edge – will shape how this episode sits within her wider legacy. Five matches on the sidelines is a significant punishment, but it is also an opportunity to reset how she is seen by fans, teammates and opponents alike.​

What This Incident Says About the Women’s Game

High‑profile flashpoints inevitably become talking points about the sport as a whole. Some critics will latch onto the WWE‑style descriptions to paint women’s football as chaotic or unrefined, but that reading ignores the context: a single, exceptional incident punished more harshly precisely because it does not represent the norm.​

Instead, the case underlines how seriously the women’s game is taking issues of discipline and player protection. The FA’s willingness to push for an extended ban, and an independent commission’s agreement to impose it, reinforces a culture that prioritises safety over spectacle when those two collide. For younger players watching, the lesson is equally clear: physicality is part of football, but crossing into wrestling moves is not just a bad look, it is a fast track to a long ban.​

Ultimately, Ruesha Littlejohn’s five‑match suspension will be remembered less for the scoreline of Palace 3–0 Leicester, and more as a case study in where modern football draws the line on violent conduct. The hope across the game will be that this is a one‑off moment that leads to lasting lessons – for the player involved, for clubs managing emotions on the pitch, and for a sport that must constantly balance intensity with safety.

~~~ By Dribble Diaries